中国法律网
法律通行证: 用户名: 密码:  注册
律师加盟热线:400-8919-913   律信通 律信通  
律师
公众 咨询 贴吧
律信通 案件委托
频道 房产 婚姻 交通事故 保险 建设工程 劳动
留学
公司 合同 刑事辩护 医疗 知识产权 工商
新闻 宽频 文书 常识 案例
法规 专题 杂志 百科 论文
查找全国各地律师: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 点击各城市名拼音首字母查找律师 公众找律师,信赖律信通!律师做宣传,首选律信通!
公检法司
频道直达: 法界新闻 | 公安 | 检察 | 法院 | 司法 | 工商 | 税务 | 质检 | 聚焦国土 | 矿山与安全
公检法司
土地法规
当前位置: 主页 > 民商 > 土地 > 土地法规 >

A dispute between Wahaha and Danone

时间:2012-04-28 20:49来源:太虚真人 作者:荔枝算卦先生 中国法律网

These days, more and more focus is on the dispute between Hang Zhou Wahaha Group Co., Ltd.(herein after refer to as “Wahaha”) and Danone China (herein after refer to as “Danone”). The two companies have cooperated with each other for 10 years. Now the biggest dispute between them is the trademark named “娃哈哈”. Both parties want to get the ownership of the trademark and prevent the other from using it. Wahaha believes to be the first one to apply this trademark and therefore has the ownership of the trademark, while Danone claims that it is the rightful user of the trademark due to a license agreement entered into by both parties. But the fact is that at first, both parties have signed a trademark transfer agreement, but when they send it to Trademark Office of P.R.C. for registration, the Office did not give any written reply (regardless if approved or dismissed). However, both parties did also sign two separate trademark license agreements, one that was sent for record in Trademark Office of P.R.C. and the other was kept by the parties. So this brings the conflict between both parties now. Danone has brought this issue before the arbitration court in Stockholm , Sweden and a suit in USA , and at the same time, Wahaha brought the case before arbitration court in Hang Zhou, P.R.C.

(责任编辑:admin)
------分隔线----------------------------
免费法律咨询 在线提交,三十分钟内百分百回复!
中国法律网 版权所有 邮箱:service@5Law.cn 建议使用:1024x768分辨率,16位以上颜色 | 京ICP备2023040428号-1联系我们 有事点这里    [切换城市▲] 公司法
400-8919-913 工作日:9:00-18:00
周 六:9:00-12:00

法律咨询5分钟内回复
请用微信扫描二维码
关闭

关注网站CEO微信,与CEO对话